Assess whether agents must have a human gate for external actions (49605f)

Situation

Lifecycle and Accountability work in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA now turns on agents must have a human gate because drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show put reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality in play. Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner should say what reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality proves.

Decision

Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

Hypotheses to test

• Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can defend Policy or governance breach from reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show in a AI Governance Layer challenge.
• Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner cannot defend Policy or governance breach from reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.
• Drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show never reached the population in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality — reopen intake, do not close agents must have a human gate.
• Two facts in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show conflict for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner; hold this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

Analysis required

• Test whether drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged.
• Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA.
• For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move agents must have a human gate for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.