Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (ce2949)

SITUATION Policy and Oversight work in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor now turns on the hiring tool should because a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal put vendor model card with missing evaluation slices in play. Model-risk officer should say what vendor model card with missing evaluation slices proves.

DECISION Model-risk officer in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices is the one a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Policy and Oversight file. 2. The population in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices is adjacent only to a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call. 3. A university licensing an AI proctoring vendor already contained a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal before vendor model card with missing evaluation slices arrived; no new Policy and Oversight path. 4. Provenance on vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Walk the model input/output path recorded in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 2. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate model-risk officer can actually point to. 3. Walk the model input/output path recorded in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read vendor model card with missing evaluation slices against a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for model-risk officer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what model-risk officer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the hiring tool should, then the evidence in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices, then the action for model-risk officer - Hypothesis scorecard against vendor model card with missing evaluation slices: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Policy and Oversight would cite