Assess whether an agent may take actions without a human gate (8bcabb)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Training-data provenance questionnaire arrived with an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty for board AI liaison. That is a AI Governance Bias and Training Data decision on an agent may take in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm.
Decision
Board AI liaison in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using training-data provenance questionnaire after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in training-data provenance questionnaire is the one an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Bias and Training Data file.
- The population in training-data provenance questionnaire is adjacent only to an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call.
- A city using a hiring-screen algorithm already contained an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty before training-data provenance questionnaire arrived; no new Bias and Training Data path.
- Provenance on training-data provenance questionnaire after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.
Analysis required
- Reproduce the incident row in training-data provenance questionnaire and say whether it ever touched production data.
- Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in training-data provenance questionnaire.
- Reproduce the incident row in training-data provenance questionnaire and say whether it ever touched production data.
- For this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file, read training-data provenance questionnaire against an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty and write the one fact that would move an agent may take for board AI liaison.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Bias and Training Data packet (training-data provenance questionnaire after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty). Lead with the AI Governance option training-data provenance questionnaire can support after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for board AI liaison in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether a generative-AI incident is a policy breach or a model defect
- Assess whether the inventory can be represented to an examiner as complete
- Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (89172b)
- Whether human review is real or a rubber stamp from hiring-tool
- Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (208972)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

