Assess whether an alternate source is technically qualified (5512eb)

SITUATION Repair-history file that will not tie to cost arrived with a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst. That is a Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence decision on an alternate source is in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract.

DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Fund and move materiel now; repair-history file that will not tie to cost already has the discriminator after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN. 2. Keep Cannibalize or substitute in force until repair-history file that will not tie to cost is completed after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst. 3. Treat repair-history file that will not tie to cost as Defer a cycle because both readings appear after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN. 4. Refuse a Defense Sustainment close: obsolescence and DMSMS analyst does not have the decision an alternate source is turns on in repair-history file that will not tie to cost.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify mission impact if an alternate source is is deferred one cycle in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 2. Reconcile depot demand in repair-history file that will not tie to cost to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN. 3. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move repair-history file that will not tie to cost. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read repair-history file that will not tie to cost against a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN and write the one fact that would move an alternate source is for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN). If repair-history file that will not tie to cost cannot force a Defense Sustainment label under Depot Procurement Intelligence, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on an alternate source is, then the evidence in repair-history file that will not tie to cost, then the action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against repair-history file that will not tie to cost: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite