Assess whether an alternate source is technically qualified (b424ee)

SITUATION DLA item manager's data counterpart at a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data is reviewing unpriced contractual action aging list after document numbers that collide across two systems of record. The question on that extract is whether an alternate source is technically qualified. The packet does not yet prove Fund and move materiel versus Cannibalize or substitute.

DECISION DLA item manager's data counterpart in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using unpriced contractual action aging list after document numbers that collide across two systems of record.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in unpriced contractual action aging list is the one document numbers that collide across two systems of record named, so Fund and move materiel follows for this Depot Procurement Intelligence file. 2. The population in unpriced contractual action aging list is adjacent only to document numbers that collide across two systems of record; Cannibalize or substitute is the honest Defense Sustainment call. 3. A contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data already contained document numbers that collide across two systems of record before unpriced contractual action aging list arrived; no new Depot Procurement Intelligence path. 4. Provenance on unpriced contractual action aging list after document numbers that collide across two systems of record is broken; do not pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify mission impact if an alternate source is is deferred one cycle in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data. 2. Reconcile depot demand in unpriced contractual action aging list to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after document numbers that collide across two systems of record. 3. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move unpriced contractual action aging list. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read unpriced contractual action aging list against document numbers that collide across two systems of record and write the one fact that would move an alternate source is for DLA item manager's data counterpart.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (unpriced contractual action aging list after document numbers that collide across two systems of record). The follow-on Depot Procurement Intelligence action is what DLA item manager's data counterpart does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.