Assess whether an audit finding is a program-wide failure from prescription

SITUATION Prescription that could explain an opioid positive arrived with a hair result the labor counsel wants to use in a termination for oral-fluid implementation lead. That is a Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity decision on an audit finding is in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive.

DECISION Oral-fluid implementation lead in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using prescription that could explain an opioid positive after a hair result the labor counsel wants to use in a termination.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Oral-fluid implementation lead can defend Accept the result from prescription that could explain an opioid positive after a hair result the labor counsel wants to use in a termination in a Forensic Drug Testing challenge. 2. Oral-fluid implementation lead cannot defend Accept the result from prescription that could explain an opioid positive; Reject on custody is what the extract actually supports after a hair result the labor counsel wants to use in a termination. 3. A hair result the labor counsel wants to use in a termination never reached the population in prescription that could explain an opioid positive — reopen intake, do not close an audit finding is. 4. Two facts in prescription that could explain an opioid positive after a hair result the labor counsel wants to use in a termination conflict for oral-fluid implementation lead; hold this Specimen Validity file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Walk chain of custody, collection site, and validity flags in prescription that could explain an opioid positive after a hair result the labor counsel wants to use in a termination. 2. Name the step oral-fluid implementation lead cannot reconstruct from prescription that could explain an opioid positive. 3. Test whether a broken seal, timing miss, or donor explanation changes an audit finding is. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity file, read prescription that could explain an opioid positive against a hair result the labor counsel wants to use in a termination and write the one fact that would move an audit finding is for oral-fluid implementation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Specimen Validity packet (prescription that could explain an opioid positive after a hair result the labor counsel wants to use in a termination). The follow-on Specimen Validity action is what oral-fluid implementation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Forensic Drug Testing option on an audit finding is, then the evidence in prescription that could explain an opioid positive, then the action for oral-fluid implementation lead - Hypothesis scorecard against prescription that could explain an opioid positive: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for oral-fluid implementation lead in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive - What changes an audit finding is if a hair result the labor counsel wants to use in a termination is later withdrawn