Decision-audit designer must resolve whether audits can reconstruct who

Situation

Decision-audit designer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights has one working extract — decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step — after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure. If decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step cannot support audits can reconstruct who, the honest AI Governance Layer output is hold.

Decision

Decision-audit designer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Policy or governance breach now; decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step already has the discriminator after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.
• Keep Model defect in force until decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is completed after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure for decision-audit designer.
• Treat decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step as Dual failure because both readings appear after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.
• Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: decision-audit designer does not have the page audits can reconstruct who turns on in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step.

Analysis required

• Score whether the agent action in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged.
• Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights.
• Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate decision-audit designer can enforce.
• For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure and write the one fact that would move audits can reconstruct who for decision-audit designer.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what decision-audit designer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.