Assess whether audits can reconstruct who authorized what (ace5b8)

Situation

Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality arrived with a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure for AI committee secretariat. That is a AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability decision on audits can reconstruct who in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.

Decision

AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.

Hypotheses to test

• Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality reads as Policy or governance breach once a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population.
• Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is closer to Model defect after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract.
• Dual failure is still live in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.
• Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is missing the fact AI committee secretariat needs after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

Analysis required

• Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged.
• Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.
• Map the control-plane score in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce.
• For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure and write the one fact that would move audits can reconstruct who for AI committee secretariat.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality can support after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.