Assess whether the bid is compliant enough to survive a responsiveness check

SITUATION The Performance and Teaming working file is price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year. Past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must name Pursue or Pursue with conditions for this Government RFP file. Past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft has to name Pursue or Pursue with conditions for this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file.

DECISION Past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate is the one a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year named, so Pursue follows for this Performance and Teaming file. 2. The population in price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate is adjacent only to a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year; Pursue with conditions is the honest Government RFP call. 3. A joint venture with an uneven workshare draft already contained a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year before price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate arrived; no new Performance and Teaming path. 4. Provenance on price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year is broken; do not pick Pursue or Pursue with conditions yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score competitive posture if past-performance volume owner pursues, partners, or no-bids. 2. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft cannot waive quietly. 3. Map Section L/M requirements in price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate to evaluator notes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year. 4. For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate against a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year and write the one fact that would move the bid is compliant for past-performance volume owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year). Lead with the Government RFP option price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate can support after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft.