Assess whether the board has been accurately briefed (c9d706)

SITUATION Explainability pack for a denied-credit decision arrived with an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty for chief AI officer. That is a AI Governance Policy and Oversight decision on the board has been in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm.

DECISION Chief AI officer in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using explainability pack for a denied-credit decision after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; explainability pack for a denied-credit decision already has the discriminator after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty. 2. Keep Model defect in force until explainability pack for a denied-credit decision is completed after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty for chief AI officer. 3. Treat explainability pack for a denied-credit decision as Dual failure because both readings appear after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty. 4. Refuse a AI Governance close: chief AI officer does not have the decision the board has been turns on in explainability pack for a denied-credit decision.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Walk the model input/output path recorded in explainability pack for a denied-credit decision and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 2. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate chief AI officer can actually point to. 3. Walk the model input/output path recorded in explainability pack for a denied-credit decision and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read explainability pack for a denied-credit decision against an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty and write the one fact that would move the board has been for chief AI officer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (explainability pack for a denied-credit decision after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty). If explainability pack for a denied-credit decision cannot force a AI Governance label under Policy and Oversight, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a city using a hiring-screen algorithm does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the board has been, then the evidence in explainability pack for a denied-credit decision, then the action for chief AI officer - Hypothesis scorecard against explainability pack for a denied-credit decision: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes the board has been if an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty is later withdrawn - Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others