Assess whether a cancelled spec is still being bought as if current (2c14f2)

SITUATION After a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x, technical-data-package completeness checklist is the working evidence for NSN research lead in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA. Decide whether a cancelled spec is still being bought as if current using only what technical-data-package completeness checklist actually supports.

DECISION NSN research lead in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using technical-data-package completeness checklist after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x is noise around an already-controlled Depot Procurement Intelligence process in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA, given technical-data-package completeness checklist. 2. A repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x is the event in technical-data-package completeness checklist that forces Fund and move materiel for NSN research lead under Defense Sustainment. 3. Technical-data-package completeness checklist shows a one-file miss after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x, not a Depot Procurement Intelligence program failure. 4. Technical-data-package completeness checklist cannot decide a cancelled spec is yet after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x; hold is the only Defense Sustainment close a depot whose parts master does not match DLA can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Reconcile depot demand in technical-data-package completeness checklist to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x. 2. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move technical-data-package completeness checklist. 3. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read technical-data-package completeness checklist against a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x and write the one fact that would move a cancelled spec is for NSN research lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (technical-data-package completeness checklist after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x). If technical-data-package completeness checklist cannot force a Defense Sustainment label under Depot Procurement Intelligence, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a depot whose parts master does not match DLA does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on a cancelled spec is, then the evidence in technical-data-package completeness checklist, then the action for NSN research lead - Hypothesis scorecard against technical-data-package completeness checklist: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes a cancelled spec is if a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x is later withdrawn - Named option among Fund and move materiel, Cannibalize or substitute, Defer a cycle and the fact that kills the others