Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (304068)
August 31, 2026
SITUATION The People and Contracts working file is related-party revenue that disappears at close after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map. Commercial-diligence partner in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate must name Proceed or Reprice for this M&A Due Diligence file. Commercial-diligence partner in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate has to name Proceed or Reprice for this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file.
DECISION Commercial-diligence partner in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using related-party revenue that disappears at close after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Proceed now; related-party revenue that disappears at close already has the discriminator after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map. 2. Keep Reprice in force until related-party revenue that disappears at close is completed after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map for commercial-diligence partner. 3. Treat related-party revenue that disappears at close as Walk because both readings appear after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map. 4. Refuse a M&A Due Diligence close: commercial-diligence partner does not have the decision the carve-out is operable turns on in related-party revenue that disappears at close.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in related-party revenue that disappears at close. 2. Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate would inherit. 3. Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in related-party revenue that disappears at close to the carve-out is operable. 4. For this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file, read related-party revenue that disappears at close against IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map and write the one fact that would move the carve-out is operable for commercial-diligence partner.
RECOMMENDATION Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts packet (related-party revenue that disappears at close after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map). Lead with the M&A Due Diligence option related-party revenue that disappears at close can support after IT diligence showing two ERPs and no chart of accounts map, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for commercial-diligence partner in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky after a peg set at
- Assess whether integration costs were sandbagged in the CIM (d75cbb)
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder after a Phase II
- Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop (472cc8)
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (fca03f)
Explore related decision areas
- Umbrella referral underwriter must resolve whether a warranty should beInsurance Underwriting
- Assess whether cyber controls claimed are actually in force (d79949)Insurance Underwriting
- Assess whether inventory exists or is only on paper (a1bd5b)Forensic Accounting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

