Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (98b41c)
August 31, 2026
SITUATION Add-backs that are just delayed opex put working-capital peg versus seasonal reality in front of integration-risk PMO in a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on. This M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts decision is the carve-out is operable from working-capital peg versus seasonal reality, and the live options are Proceed, Reprice, Walk.
DECISION Integration-risk PMO in a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after add-backs that are just delayed opex.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Integration-risk PMO can defend Proceed from working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after add-backs that are just delayed opex in a M&A Due Diligence challenge. 2. Integration-risk PMO cannot defend Proceed from working-capital peg versus seasonal reality; Reprice is what the extract actually supports after add-backs that are just delayed opex. 3. Add-backs that are just delayed opex never reached the population in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality — reopen intake, do not close the carve-out is operable. 4. Two facts in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after add-backs that are just delayed opex conflict for integration-risk PMO; hold this People and Contracts file.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality to the carve-out is operable. 2. Name the document integration-risk PMO still needs before signing. 3. Test whether add-backs that are just delayed opex is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away. 4. For this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file, read working-capital peg versus seasonal reality against add-backs that are just delayed opex and write the one fact that would move the carve-out is operable for integration-risk PMO.
RECOMMENDATION Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts packet (working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after add-backs that are just delayed opex). The follow-on People and Contracts action is what integration-risk PMO does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line M&A Due Diligence option on the carve-out is operable, then the evidence in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality, then the action for integration-risk PMO - Hypothesis scorecard against working-capital peg versus seasonal reality: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for integration-risk PMO in a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on - What changes the carve-out is operable if add-backs that are just delayed opex is later withdrawn
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether integration costs were sandbagged in the CIM (5d2131)
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (fade43)
- Assess whether environmental liability is capped or open-ended (23f0e3)
- Assess whether IP is owned or merely licensed after a customer who just sent
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (546df0)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

