Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (ee7174)

SITUATION After drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show, decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is what multi-model reconciliation lead can touch in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Multi-model reconciliation lead can defend Policy or governance breach from decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. Multi-model reconciliation lead cannot defend Policy or governance breach from decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 3. Drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show never reached the population in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step — reopen intake, do not close the committee can overrule. 4. Two facts in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show conflict for multi-model reconciliation lead; hold this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate multi-model reconciliation lead can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let the committee can overrule proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step can support after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions.