Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (6698b8)

SITUATION Multi-model disagreement log on production cases arrived with an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output for enterprise AI control-plane owner. That is a AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms decision on the committee can overrule in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using multi-model disagreement log on production cases after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; multi-model disagreement log on production cases already has the discriminator after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output. 2. Keep Model defect in force until multi-model disagreement log on production cases is completed after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output for enterprise AI control-plane owner. 3. Treat multi-model disagreement log on production cases as Dual failure because both readings appear after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: enterprise AI control-plane owner does not have the decision the committee can overrule turns on in multi-model disagreement log on production cases.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 2. Score whether the agent action in multi-model disagreement log on production cases was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 3. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read multi-model disagreement log on production cases against an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (multi-model disagreement log on production cases after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option multi-model disagreement log on production cases can support after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights.