Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (436f0c)

SITUATION Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output arrived with a batch job still calling a retired endpoint for AI committee secretariat. That is a AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability decision on the committee can overrule in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output already has the discriminator after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint. 2. Keep Model defect in force until output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is completed after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output as Dual failure because both readings appear after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision the committee can overrule turns on in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 2. Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let the committee can overrule proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a batch job still calling a retired endpoint and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on the committee can overrule, then the evidence in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output, then the action for AI committee secretariat - Hypothesis scorecard against output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy - What changes the committee can overrule if a batch job still calling a retired endpoint is later withdrawn