Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (b48de9)

SITUATION Lifecycle and Accountability work in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA now turns on the committee can overrule because a committee that has not met since the last incident put reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality in play. Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner should say what reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality proves.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a committee that has not met since the last incident.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality reads as Policy or governance breach once a committee that has not met since the last incident is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is closer to Model defect after a committee that has not met since the last incident; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 4. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is missing the fact vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner needs after a committee that has not met since the last incident; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality to the policy gate vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let the committee can overrule proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a committee that has not met since the last incident changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a committee that has not met since the last incident and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a committee that has not met since the last incident). If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Lifecycle and Accountability, stop. If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a committee that has not met since the last incident cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close, vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.