Assess whether condemnation rates imply a quality escape (37d201)

SITUATION Document numbers that collide across two systems of record put repair-history file that will not tie to cost in front of DLA item manager's data counterpart in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data. This Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence close is condemnation rates imply a from repair-history file that will not tie to cost, and the live options are Fund and move materiel, Cannibalize or substitute, Defer a cycle.

DECISION DLA item manager's data counterpart in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using repair-history file that will not tie to cost after document numbers that collide across two systems of record.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Repair-history file that will not tie to cost reads as Fund and move materiel once document numbers that collide across two systems of record is lined up to the same Defense Sustainment population. 2. Repair-history file that will not tie to cost is closer to Cannibalize or substitute after document numbers that collide across two systems of record; Fund and move materiel would over-claim this Depot Procurement Intelligence extract. 3. Defer a cycle is still live in repair-history file that will not tie to cost for DLA item manager's data counterpart in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data. 4. Repair-history file that will not tie to cost is missing the fact DLA item manager's data counterpart needs after document numbers that collide across two systems of record; stop this Defense Sustainment close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 2. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in repair-history file that will not tie to cost. 3. Quantify mission impact if condemnation rates imply a is deferred one cycle in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read repair-history file that will not tie to cost against document numbers that collide across two systems of record and write the one fact that would move condemnation rates imply a for DLA item manager's data counterpart.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (repair-history file that will not tie to cost after document numbers that collide across two systems of record). The follow-on Depot Procurement Intelligence action is what DLA item manager's data counterpart does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.