Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (3ca6c1)

SITUATION A live AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file in a hospital committee that never records dissent now turns on committee charter that does not define escalation after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. Decision-audit designer should state what that extract proves for whether the control plane actually controls production traffic.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using committee charter that does not define escalation after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Decision-audit designer can defend Policy or governance breach from committee charter that does not define escalation after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. Decision-audit designer cannot defend Policy or governance breach from committee charter that does not define escalation; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 3. A scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' never reached the population in committee charter that does not define escalation — reopen intake, do not close the control plane actually. 4. Two facts in committee charter that does not define escalation after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' conflict for decision-audit designer; hold this Audit and Vendor Terms file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let the control plane actually proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in committee charter that does not define escalation was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read committee charter that does not define escalation against a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (committee charter that does not define escalation after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option committee charter that does not define escalation can support after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable', then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent.