Assess whether cost history can support a fair-and-reasonable call (9048c7)

SITUATION A OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock put depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers in front of DLA item manager's data counterpart in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data. This Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence close is cost history can support from depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers, and the live options are Fund and move materiel, Cannibalize or substitute, Defer a cycle.

DECISION DLA item manager's data counterpart in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. DLA item manager's data counterpart can defend Fund and move materiel from depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock in a Defense Sustainment challenge. 2. DLA item manager's data counterpart cannot defend Fund and move materiel from depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers; Cannibalize or substitute is what the extract actually supports after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock. 3. A OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock never reached the population in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers — reopen intake, do not close cost history can support. 4. Two facts in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock conflict for DLA item manager's data counterpart; hold this Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers. 2. Quantify mission impact if cost history can support is deferred one cycle in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data. 3. Reconcile depot demand in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers against a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock and write the one fact that would move cost history can support for DLA item manager's data counterpart.

RECOMMENDATION Treat this reading of depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers as the gate for cost history can support: Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers.. If depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock confirms that reading, DLA item manager's data counterpart takes Fund and move materiel in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data. If depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers contradicts it, take Cannibalize or substitute.