Whether cost history can support a fair-and-reasonable call from unpriced

SITUATION The working file is unpriced contractual action aging list after UCAs older than the local policy cap. Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract has to name Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute for this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using unpriced contractual action aging list after UCAs older than the local policy cap.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in unpriced contractual action aging list is the one UCAs older than the local policy cap named, so Fund and move materiel follows for this Depot Procurement Intelligence file. 2. The population in unpriced contractual action aging list is adjacent only to UCAs older than the local policy cap; Cannibalize or substitute is the honest Defense Sustainment call. 3. A workload that shifted from organic repair to contract already contained UCAs older than the local policy cap before unpriced contractual action aging list arrived; no new Depot Procurement Intelligence path. 4. Provenance on unpriced contractual action aging list after UCAs older than the local policy cap is broken; do not pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in unpriced contractual action aging list. 2. Quantify mission impact if cost history can support is deferred one cycle in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 3. Reconcile depot demand in unpriced contractual action aging list to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after UCAs older than the local policy cap. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read unpriced contractual action aging list against UCAs older than the local policy cap and write the one fact that would move cost history can support for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (unpriced contractual action aging list after UCAs older than the local policy cap). Lead with the Defense Sustainment option unpriced contractual action aging list can support after UCAs older than the local policy cap, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on cost history can support, then the evidence in unpriced contractual action aging list, then the action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against unpriced contractual action aging list: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in unpriced contractual action aging list after UCAs older than the local policy cap, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite