Assess whether cost history can support a fair-and-reasonable call (607d9b)

SITUATION A repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x put unpriced contractual action aging list in front of depot procurement-intelligence analyst in an ALC working a shortage on a high-demand NSN. This Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence close is cost history can support from unpriced contractual action aging list, and the live options are Fund and move materiel, Cannibalize or substitute, Defer a cycle.

DECISION Depot procurement-intelligence analyst in an ALC working a shortage on a high-demand NSN must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using unpriced contractual action aging list after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in unpriced contractual action aging list is the one a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x named, so Fund and move materiel follows for this Depot Procurement Intelligence file. 2. The population in unpriced contractual action aging list is adjacent only to a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x; Cannibalize or substitute is the honest Defense Sustainment call. 3. An ALC working a shortage on a high-demand NSN already contained a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x before unpriced contractual action aging list arrived; no new Depot Procurement Intelligence path. 4. Provenance on unpriced contractual action aging list after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x is broken; do not pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move unpriced contractual action aging list. 2. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 3. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in unpriced contractual action aging list. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read unpriced contractual action aging list against a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x and write the one fact that would move cost history can support for depot procurement-intelligence analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (unpriced contractual action aging list after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x). Lead with the Defense Sustainment option unpriced contractual action aging list can support after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for depot procurement-intelligence analyst in an ALC working a shortage on a high-demand NSN.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on cost history can support, then the evidence in unpriced contractual action aging list, then the action for depot procurement-intelligence analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against unpriced contractual action aging list: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for depot procurement-intelligence analyst in an ALC working a shortage on a high-demand NSN - What changes cost history can support if a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x is later withdrawn