Assess whether custody defects make the result unusable from hair-test

SITUATION Specimen Validity work in a lab facing an adulterated-specimen spike now turns on custody defects make the because a collector who skipped the bluing agent put hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision in play. Return-to-duty coordinator should say what hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision proves.

DECISION Return-to-duty coordinator in a lab facing an adulterated-specimen spike must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after a collector who skipped the bluing agent.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A collector who skipped the bluing agent is noise around an already-controlled Specimen Validity process in a lab facing an adulterated-specimen spike, given hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision. 2. A collector who skipped the bluing agent is the event in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision that forces Accept the result for return-to-duty coordinator under Forensic Drug Testing. 3. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision shows a one-file miss after a collector who skipped the bluing agent, not a Specimen Validity program failure. 4. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision cannot decide custody defects make the yet after a collector who skipped the bluing agent; hold is the only Forensic Drug Testing close a lab facing an adulterated-specimen spike can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the step return-to-duty coordinator cannot reconstruct from hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision. 2. Test whether a broken seal, timing miss, or donor explanation changes custody defects make the. 3. Confirm the kit ID in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision matches the collection log. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity file, read hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision against a collector who skipped the bluing agent and write the one fact that would move custody defects make the for return-to-duty coordinator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Specimen Validity packet (hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after a collector who skipped the bluing agent). The follow-on Specimen Validity action is what return-to-duty coordinator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Forensic Drug Testing option on custody defects make the, then the evidence in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision, then the action for return-to-duty coordinator - Hypothesis scorecard against hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes custody defects make the if a collector who skipped the bluing agent is later withdrawn - Named option among Accept the result, Reject on custody, Recollect and the fact that kills the others