Assess whether custody defects make the result unusable (916769)

Situation

DOT program-design consultant in a DOT-covered motor carrier after a fatal crash has one working extract — hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision — after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff. If hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision cannot support custody defects make the, the honest Forensic Drug Testing output is hold.

Decision

DOT program-design consultant in a DOT-covered motor carrier after a fatal crash must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff.

Hypotheses to test

• An oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is noise around an already-controlled Program Design and Audit process in a DOT-covered motor carrier after a fatal crash, given hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision.
• An oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is the event in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision that forces Accept the result for DOT program-design consultant under Forensic Drug Testing.
• Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision shows a one-file miss after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff, not a Program Design and Audit program failure.
• Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision cannot decide custody defects make the yet after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff; hold is the only Forensic Drug Testing close a DOT-covered motor carrier after a fatal crash can defend.

Analysis required

• Confirm the kit ID in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision matches the collection log.
• Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol a DOT-covered motor carrier after a fatal crash claims to run.
• Walk chain of custody, collection site, and validity flags in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff.
• For this Forensic Drug Testing Program Design and Audit file, read hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision against an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff and write the one fact that would move custody defects make the for DOT program-design consultant.