Assess whether deprecation will strand a downstream process (d4b696)

Situation

Lifecycle and Accountability work in a bank running three models on the same credit file now turns on deprecation will strand a because an agent that refunded customers above its limit put reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality in play. Model-deprecation manager should say what reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality proves.

Decision

Model-deprecation manager in a bank running three models on the same credit file must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after an agent that refunded customers above its limit.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Policy or governance breach now; reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality already has the discriminator after an agent that refunded customers above its limit.
• Keep Model defect in force until reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is completed after an agent that refunded customers above its limit for model-deprecation manager.
• Treat reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality as Dual failure because both readings appear after an agent that refunded customers above its limit.
• Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: model-deprecation manager does not have the page deprecation will strand a turns on in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality.

Analysis required

• Name the override that would let deprecation will strand a proceed without a silent bypass.
• Test whether an agent that refunded customers above its limit changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged.
• For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against an agent that refunded customers above its limit and write the one fact that would move deprecation will strand a for model-deprecation manager.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after an agent that refunded customers above its limit). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality can support after an agent that refunded customers above its limit, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for model-deprecation manager in a bank running three models on the same credit file.