Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (71b707)

SITUATION After an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output, committee charter that does not define escalation is what model-deprecation manager can touch in a bank running three models on the same credit file. AI Governance Layer will live with Disagreement should block, queue, versus Log on this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION Model-deprecation manager in a bank running three models on the same credit file must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using committee charter that does not define escalation after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Committee charter that does not define escalation reads as Disagreement should block, queue, once an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Committee charter that does not define escalation is closer to Log after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output; Disagreement should block, queue, would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract. 3. A dual reading is still live in committee charter that does not define escalation for model-deprecation manager in a bank running three models on the same credit file. 4. Committee charter that does not define escalation is missing the fact model-deprecation manager needs after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let disagreement should block, queue, proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in committee charter that does not define escalation was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read committee charter that does not define escalation against an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for model-deprecation manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (committee charter that does not define escalation after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what model-deprecation manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on disagreement should block, queue,, then the evidence in committee charter that does not define escalation, then the action for model-deprecation manager - Hypothesis scorecard against committee charter that does not define escalation: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for model-deprecation manager in a bank running three models on the same credit file - What changes disagreement should block, queue, if an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output is later withdrawn