Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (f68aea)

SITUATION Lifecycle and Accountability work in a company whose agents can send email without a gate now turns on disagreement should block, queue, because drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show put committee charter that does not define escalation in play. Decision-audit designer should say what committee charter that does not define escalation proves.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using committee charter that does not define escalation after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Disagreement should block, queue, now; committee charter that does not define escalation already has the discriminator after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 2. Keep Log in force until committee charter that does not define escalation is completed after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show for decision-audit designer. 3. Treat committee charter that does not define escalation as Disagreement should block, queue, because both readings appear after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: decision-audit designer does not have the decision disagreement should block, queue, turns on in committee charter that does not define escalation.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let disagreement should block, queue, proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in committee charter that does not define escalation was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read committee charter that does not define escalation against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (committee charter that does not define escalation after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). If committee charter that does not define escalation cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Lifecycle and Accountability, stop. If committee charter that does not define escalation after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show cannot support Disagreement should block, queue, versus Log on this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close, decision-audit designer must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.