Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (2f0112)

SITUATION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy has one working extract — output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output — after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted. If output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output cannot support disagreement should block, queue,, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. AI committee secretariat can defend Disagreement should block, queue, from output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. AI committee secretariat cannot defend Disagreement should block, queue, from output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output; Log is what the extract actually supports after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted. 3. A purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted never reached the population in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output — reopen intake, do not close disagreement should block, queue,. 4. Two facts in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted conflict for AI committee secretariat; hold this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 3. Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output can support after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.