Whether disagreement should block, queue, or log from output-scoring rubric

Situation

A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice put output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output in front of post-deployment monitoring owner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. This AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring close is disagreement should block, queue, from output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output, and the live options are Disagreement should block, queue,, Log.

Decision

Post-deployment monitoring owner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

Hypotheses to test

• A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is noise around an already-controlled Control Plane and Scoring process in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA, given output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output.
• A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is the event in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output that forces Disagreement should block, queue, for post-deployment monitoring owner under AI Governance Layer.
• Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output shows a one-file miss after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, not a Control Plane and Scoring program failure.
• Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output cannot decide disagreement should block, queue, yet after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA can defend.

Analysis required

• Name the override that would let disagreement should block, queue, proceed without a silent bypass.
• Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• Score whether the agent action in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged.
• For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for post-deployment monitoring owner.