Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (99aff3)

SITUATION In an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor, reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is the evidence after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint. Multi-model reconciliation lead has to pick Disagreement should block, queue, or Log for this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms close using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality reads as Disagreement should block, queue, once a batch job still calling a retired endpoint is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is closer to Log after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint; Disagreement should block, queue, would over-claim this Audit and Vendor Terms extract. 3. A dual reading is still live in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality for multi-model reconciliation lead in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor. 4. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is missing the fact multi-model reconciliation lead needs after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality to the policy gate multi-model reconciliation lead can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let disagreement should block, queue, proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a batch job still calling a retired endpoint changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a batch job still calling a retired endpoint and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality can support after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for multi-model reconciliation lead in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor.