Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (00ff41)

SITUATION Decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent has one working extract — reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality — after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality cannot support disagreement should block, queue,, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Disagreement should block, queue, now; reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality already has the discriminator after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. 2. Keep Log in force until reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is completed after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice for decision-audit designer. 3. Treat reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality as Disagreement should block, queue, because both readings appear after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: decision-audit designer does not have the decision disagreement should block, queue, turns on in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let disagreement should block, queue, proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality can support after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent.