Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (c39f23)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Carve-out separation lead in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice has one working extract — carve-out stranded-cost model — after a Phase II that found groundwater impact. If carve-out stranded-cost model cannot support earnout definitions will cause, the honest M&A Due Diligence output is hold.
Decision
Carve-out separation lead in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using carve-out stranded-cost model after a Phase II that found groundwater impact.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Proceed now; carve-out stranded-cost model already has the discriminator after a Phase II that found groundwater impact.
- Keep Reprice in force until carve-out stranded-cost model is completed after a Phase II that found groundwater impact for carve-out separation lead.
- Treat carve-out stranded-cost model as Walk because both readings appear after a Phase II that found groundwater impact.
- Refuse a M&A Due Diligence close: carve-out separation lead does not have the page earnout definitions will cause turns on in carve-out stranded-cost model.
Analysis required
- Name the document carve-out separation lead still needs before signing.
- Test whether a Phase II that found groundwater impact is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in carve-out stranded-cost model.
- For this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file, read carve-out stranded-cost model against a Phase II that found groundwater impact and write the one fact that would move earnout definitions will cause for carve-out separation lead.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts packet (carve-out stranded-cost model after a Phase II that found groundwater impact). The follow-on People and Contracts action is what carve-out separation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Command returns
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether integration costs were sandbagged in the CIM (2ba05b)
- Whether management can run this without the founder from related-party
- Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky after a QoE that cannot tie
- Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (4182a8)
- Assess whether integration costs were sandbagged in the CIM (81621c)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether related-party revenue is arm's-length (65c615)Forensic Accounting
- Assess whether related-party revenue is arm's-length (cf1415)Forensic Accounting
- Assess whether inventory exists or is only on paper (ae6f80)Forensic Accounting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

