Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (324c3c)

SITUATION A hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model cannot treat a business unit that already went live without a risk tier as incidental context on EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet. Exam-readiness coordinator must close the hiring tool should from that extract under AI Governance / Policy and Oversight.

DECISION Exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is the one a business unit that already went live without a risk tier named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Policy and Oversight file. 2. The population in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is adjacent only to a business unit that already went live without a risk tier; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call. 3. A hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model already contained a business unit that already went live without a risk tier before EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet arrived; no new Policy and Oversight path. 4. Provenance on EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet. 2. Reproduce the incident row in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and say whether it ever touched production data. 3. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a business unit that already went live without a risk tier and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for exam-readiness coordinator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier). Lead with the AI Governance option EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet can support after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model.