Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (b047c6)

SITUATION Training-data provenance questionnaire arrived with a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy for model-risk officer. That is a AI Governance Policy and Oversight decision on the hiring tool should in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor.

DECISION Model-risk officer in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using training-data provenance questionnaire after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Model-risk officer can defend Policy or governance breach from training-data provenance questionnaire after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy in a AI Governance challenge. 2. Model-risk officer cannot defend Policy or governance breach from training-data provenance questionnaire; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy. 3. A customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy never reached the population in training-data provenance questionnaire — reopen intake, do not close the hiring tool should. 4. Two facts in training-data provenance questionnaire after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy conflict for model-risk officer; hold this Policy and Oversight file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in training-data provenance questionnaire. 2. Reproduce the incident row in training-data provenance questionnaire and say whether it ever touched production data. 3. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in training-data provenance questionnaire. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read training-data provenance questionnaire against a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for model-risk officer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (training-data provenance questionnaire after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what model-risk officer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the hiring tool should, then the evidence in training-data provenance questionnaire, then the action for model-risk officer - Hypothesis scorecard against training-data provenance questionnaire: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in training-data provenance questionnaire after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Policy and Oversight would cite