Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (067ec1)

SITUATION After an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty, training-data provenance questionnaire is what vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools can touch in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools. AI Governance will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Policy and Oversight file.

DECISION Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using training-data provenance questionnaire after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in training-data provenance questionnaire is the one an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Policy and Oversight file. 2. The population in training-data provenance questionnaire is adjacent only to an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call. 3. A manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools already contained an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty before training-data provenance questionnaire arrived; no new Policy and Oversight path. 4. Provenance on training-data provenance questionnaire after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the approved-use case to the system the hiring tool should would bind. 2. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty. 3. Map the approved-use case to the system the hiring tool should would bind. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read training-data provenance questionnaire against an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (training-data provenance questionnaire after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the hiring tool should, then the evidence in training-data provenance questionnaire, then the action for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools - Hypothesis scorecard against training-data provenance questionnaire: supported / rejected / untestable - Policy and Oversight finding in training-data provenance questionnaire that a second reviewer can re-perform - Missing page in training-data provenance questionnaire after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty, if any