Assess whether HMDA data can be relied on for the exam (81cdee)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A board asking if the bank should settle a matched-pair study put appraisal-gap outcomes in majority-minority tracts in front of community-development lender in a manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files. This Fair Lending / Examination and Notices close is HMDA data can be relied on from appraisal-gap outcomes in majority-minority tracts, and the live options are Remove access or reverse the item, Temporary compensating control, Approve a documented exception.
Decision
Community-development lender in a manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using appraisal-gap outcomes in majority-minority tracts after a board asking if the bank should settle a matched-pair study.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Remove access or reverse the item now; appraisal-gap outcomes in majority-minority tracts already has the discriminator after a board asking if the bank should settle a matched-pair study.
- Keep Temporary compensating control in force until appraisal-gap outcomes in majority-minority tracts is completed after a board asking if the bank should settle a matched-pair study for community-development lender.
- Treat appraisal-gap outcomes in majority-minority tracts as Approve a documented exception because both readings appear after a board asking if the bank should settle a matched-pair study.
- Refuse a Fair Lending close: community-development lender does not have the page HMDA data can be relied on turns on in appraisal-gap outcomes in majority-minority tracts.
Analysis required
- Compare appraisal-gap outcomes in majority-minority tracts to similarly situated files, second-review notes, and reason codes after a board asking if the bank should settle a matched-pair study.
- Flag any disparate-impact table community-development lender cannot explain from appraisal-gap outcomes in majority-minority tracts.
- Test a documented exception versus a pattern a manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files must defend.
- For this Fair Lending Examination and Notices file, read appraisal-gap outcomes in majority-minority tracts against a board asking if the bank should settle a matched-pair study and write the one fact that would move HMDA data can be relied on for community-development lender.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether dealer overlays introduce prohibited steering (b9e4b1)
- Assess whether to pause a product pending a lookback (7964e2)
- Assess whether notices match the actual decisioning reasons (07e6e4)
- Assess whether line assignments have a disparate impact the bank will defend
- Assess whether comparative files show second-review bias (a83710)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

