Assess whether HMDA data can be relied on for the exam (090dc3)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
After a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test, CRA assessment-area versus lending footprint is what second-review underwriter can touch in a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts. Fair Lending will live with Remove access or reverse the item versus Temporary compensating control on this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
Decision
Second-review underwriter in a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using CRA assessment-area versus lending footprint after a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test.
Hypotheses to test
- A vendor score change with no disparate-impact test is noise around an already-controlled CRA and Special-Purpose Programs process in a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts, given CRA assessment-area versus lending footprint.
- A vendor score change with no disparate-impact test is the event in CRA assessment-area versus lending footprint that forces Remove access or reverse the item for second-review underwriter under Fair Lending.
- CRA assessment-area versus lending footprint shows a one-file miss after a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test, not a CRA and Special-Purpose Programs program failure.
- CRA assessment-area versus lending footprint cannot decide HMDA data can be relied on yet after a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test; hold is the only Fair Lending close a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts can defend.
Analysis required
- Flag any disparate-impact table second-review underwriter cannot explain from CRA assessment-area versus lending footprint.
- Test a documented exception versus a pattern a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts must defend.
- Match the adverse-action language to the facts in CRA assessment-area versus lending footprint.
- For this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file, read CRA assessment-area versus lending footprint against a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test and write the one fact that would move HMDA data can be relied on for second-review underwriter.
Recommendation
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether a model update needs a fair-lending revalidation (08e855)
- Assess whether pricing disparities are justified by legitimate factors
- Assess whether a redlining pattern exists after controls (e29c2b)
- Assess whether pricing disparities are justified by legitimate factors
- Assess whether the exam response should concede a finding (31b36c)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether to non-renew a deteriorating book segment from umbrellaInsurance Underwriting
- D&O specialist must resolve whether product recall exposure is pricedInsurance Underwriting
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (66da9e)AI Governance
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

