Second-review underwriter must resolve whether HMDA data can be relied on
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Second-review underwriter in a small-business desk using a new vendor score has one working extract — mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group — after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP. If mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group cannot support HMDA data can be relied on, the honest Fair Lending output is hold.
Decision
Second-review underwriter in a small-business desk using a new vendor score must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Remove access or reverse the item now; mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group already has the discriminator after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP.
- Keep Temporary compensating control in force until mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group is completed after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP for second-review underwriter.
- Treat mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group as Approve a documented exception because both readings appear after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP.
- Refuse a Fair Lending close: second-review underwriter does not have the page HMDA data can be relied on turns on in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group.
Analysis required
- Match the adverse-action language to the facts in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group.
- Check HMDA coding and underwriting policy against HMDA data can be relied on.
- Compare mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group to similarly situated files, second-review notes, and reason codes after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP.
- For this Fair Lending Redlining and HMDA Data file, read mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group against a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP and write the one fact that would move HMDA data can be relied on for second-review underwriter.
Recommendation
Choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold on this Fair Lending / Redlining and HMDA Data packet (mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP). If mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group cannot force a Fair Lending label under Redlining and HMDA Data, stop. If mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP cannot support Remove access or reverse the item versus Temporary compensating control on this Fair Lending Redlining and HMDA Data close, second-review underwriter must do not infer a control or scheme beyond the transaction and entitlement evidence.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether pricing disparities are justified by legitimate factors
- Assess whether HMDA data can be relied on for the exam (987133)
- Assess whether line assignments have a disparate impact the bank will defend
- Assess whether the CRA plan is strategy or window dressing (86bbce)
- HMDA data-quality manager must resolve whether HMDA data can be relied on
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

