Assess whether HMDA data can be relied on for the exam (aab895)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time put small-business decline comparative file set in front of CRA strategist in a bank with thin HMDA LAR quality. This Fair Lending / Examination and Notices close is HMDA data can be relied on from small-business decline comparative file set, and the live options are Remove access or reverse the item, Temporary compensating control, Approve a documented exception.
Decision
CRA strategist in a bank with thin HMDA LAR quality must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using small-business decline comparative file set after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time.
Hypotheses to test
- CRA strategist can defend Remove access or reverse the item from small-business decline comparative file set after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time in a Fair Lending challenge.
- CRA strategist cannot defend Remove access or reverse the item from small-business decline comparative file set; Temporary compensating control is what the extract actually supports after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time.
- A notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time never reached the population in small-business decline comparative file set — reopen intake, do not close HMDA data can be relied on.
- Two facts in small-business decline comparative file set after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time conflict for CRA strategist; hold this Examination and Notices file.
Analysis required
- Check HMDA coding and underwriting policy against HMDA data can be relied on.
- Compare small-business decline comparative file set to similarly situated files, second-review notes, and reason codes after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time.
- Flag any disparate-impact table CRA strategist cannot explain from small-business decline comparative file set.
- For this Fair Lending Examination and Notices file, read small-business decline comparative file set against a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time and write the one fact that would move HMDA data can be relied on for CRA strategist.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether a special-purpose program is well designed or a pretext
- Assess whether to pause a product pending a lookback (9cfe94)
- Assess whether notices match the actual decisioning reasons (7d6834)
- Assess whether pricing disparities are justified by legitimate factors
- Assess whether notices match the actual decisioning reasons (91e6a5)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

