Assess whether a household is receiving duplicate subsidies (c1b8cf)

Situation

Compliance and Integrity Operations work in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave now turns on a household is receiving because a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE put recoupment aging versus collectability in play. Compliance and Integrity Operations work in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave now turns on a household is receiving because a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE put recoupment aging versus collectability in play; housing-subsidy fraud investigator should say what recoupment aging versus collectability proves for Public Benefits.

Decision

Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using recoupment aging versus collectability after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in recoupment aging versus collectability is the one a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE named, so Pay or continue follows for this Compliance and Integrity Operations file.
• The population in recoupment aging versus collectability is adjacent only to a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE; Recoup is the honest Public Benefits call.
• A state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave already contained a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE before recoupment aging versus collectability arrived; no new Compliance and Integrity Operations path.
• Provenance on recoupment aging versus collectability after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE is broken; do not pick Pay or continue or Recoup yet.

Analysis required

• Trace the notice and appeal path housing-subsidy fraud investigator must preserve.
• Test eligibility, recoupment, and improper-payment facts in recoupment aging versus collectability after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE.
• Quantify overpayment if a household is receiving is wrong.
• For this Public Benefits Compliance and Integrity Operations file, read recoupment aging versus collectability against a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE and write the one fact that would move a household is receiving for housing-subsidy fraud investigator.

Recommendation