Assess whether a household is receiving duplicate subsidies from retailer

SITUATION Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike has one working extract — retailer trafficking red-flag report — after a recoupment that would make a household homeless. If retailer trafficking red-flag report cannot support a household is receiving, the only defensible Public Benefits output is hold.

DECISION Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using retailer trafficking red-flag report after a recoupment that would make a household homeless.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Retailer trafficking red-flag report reads as Pay or continue once a recoupment that would make a household homeless is lined up to the same Public Benefits population. 2. Retailer trafficking red-flag report is closer to Recoup after a recoupment that would make a household homeless; Pay or continue would over-claim this Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud extract. 3. Deny is still live in retailer trafficking red-flag report for housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike. 4. Retailer trafficking red-flag report is missing the fact housing-subsidy fraud investigator needs after a recoupment that would make a household homeless; stop this Public Benefits close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify overpayment if a household is receiving is wrong. 2. Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike. 3. Match household facts in retailer trafficking red-flag report to the rule that pays the benefit. 4. For this Public Benefits Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud file, read retailer trafficking red-flag report against a recoupment that would make a household homeless and write the one fact that would move a household is receiving for housing-subsidy fraud investigator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold on this Public Benefits / Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud packet (retailer trafficking red-flag report after a recoupment that would make a household homeless). The follow-on Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud action is what housing-subsidy fraud investigator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Public Benefits option on a household is receiving, then the evidence in retailer trafficking red-flag report, then the action for housing-subsidy fraud investigator - Hypothesis scorecard against retailer trafficking red-flag report: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Pay or continue, Recoup, Deny and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike