Assess whether identity proofing exceptions are being abused (57aaf9)

SITUATION Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud work in a disability unit facing a backlog of CDRs now turns on identity proofing exceptions are because two Section 8 files with the same landlord and overlapping tenants put recoupment aging versus collectability in play. Issuance-system integrity manager should say what recoupment aging versus collectability proves.

DECISION Issuance-system integrity manager in a disability unit facing a backlog of CDRs must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using recoupment aging versus collectability after two Section 8 files with the same landlord and overlapping tenants.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Recoupment aging versus collectability reads as Pay or continue once two Section 8 files with the same landlord and overlapping tenants is lined up to the same Public Benefits population. 2. Recoupment aging versus collectability is closer to Recoup after two Section 8 files with the same landlord and overlapping tenants; Pay or continue would over-claim this Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud extract. 3. Deny is still live in recoupment aging versus collectability for issuance-system integrity manager in a disability unit facing a backlog of CDRs. 4. Recoupment aging versus collectability is missing the fact issuance-system integrity manager needs after two Section 8 files with the same landlord and overlapping tenants; stop this Public Benefits close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a disability unit facing a backlog of CDRs. 2. Match household facts in recoupment aging versus collectability to the rule that pays the benefit. 3. Trace the notice and appeal path issuance-system integrity manager must preserve. 4. For this Public Benefits Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud file, read recoupment aging versus collectability against two Section 8 files with the same landlord and overlapping tenants and write the one fact that would move identity proofing exceptions are for issuance-system integrity manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold on this Public Benefits / Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud packet (recoupment aging versus collectability after two Section 8 files with the same landlord and overlapping tenants). The follow-on Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud action is what issuance-system integrity manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Public Benefits option on identity proofing exceptions are, then the evidence in recoupment aging versus collectability, then the action for issuance-system integrity manager - Hypothesis scorecard against recoupment aging versus collectability: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes identity proofing exceptions are if two Section 8 files with the same landlord and overlapping tenants is later withdrawn - Named option among Pay or continue, Recoup, Deny and the fact that kills the others