Assess whether the intrusion is still active (30270f)

Situation

In an exporter with a possible OFAC touchpoint, RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause is the evidence after a SAR the institution filed late after a wire already left. Contracting officer's technical representative has to pick Pursue or Pursue with conditions for this US Federal M&A Regulatory Due Diligence close using RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause.

Decision

Contracting officer's technical representative in an exporter with a possible OFAC touchpoint must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause after a SAR the institution filed late after a wire already left.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Pursue now; RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause already has the discriminator after a SAR the institution filed late after a wire already left.
• Keep Pursue with conditions in force until RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause is completed after a SAR the institution filed late after a wire already left for contracting officer's technical representative.
• Treat RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause as Partner because both readings appear after a SAR the institution filed late after a wire already left.
• Refuse a US Federal close: contracting officer's technical representative does not have the page the intrusion is still active turns on in RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause.

Analysis required

• Normalize pricing and CPARS/QASP evidence that actually supports the intrusion is still active.
• Compare PTW and compliance gates in RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause to a pursue / partner / no-bid split.
• Test OCI and SAM.gov status before an exporter with a possible OFAC touchpoint commits.
• For this US Federal M&A Regulatory Due Diligence file, read RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause against a SAR the institution filed late after a wire already left and write the one fact that would move the intrusion is still active for contracting officer's technical representative.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this US Federal / M&A Regulatory Due Diligence packet (RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause after a SAR the institution filed late after a wire already left). The follow-on M&A Regulatory Due Diligence action is what contracting officer's technical representative does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.