Litigation-support partner must resolve whether inventory exists or is only

Situation

A tax-authority information document request put ghost-employee payroll extract in front of litigation-support partner in a county government payroll environment. This Forensic Accounting / Revenue Integrity close is inventory exists or is from ghost-employee payroll extract, and the live options are Inventory exists, Is only on paper.

Decision

Litigation-support partner in a county government payroll environment must choose Inventory exists / Is only on paper using ghost-employee payroll extract after a tax-authority information document request.

Hypotheses to test

• Ghost-employee payroll extract reads as Inventory exists once a tax-authority information document request is lined up to the same Forensic Accounting population.
• Ghost-employee payroll extract is closer to Is only on paper after a tax-authority information document request; Inventory exists would over-claim this Revenue Integrity extract.
• A dual reading is still live in ghost-employee payroll extract for litigation-support partner in a county government payroll environment.
• Ghost-employee payroll extract is missing the fact litigation-support partner needs after a tax-authority information document request; stop this Forensic Accounting close.

Analysis required

• Trace approval, SoD, and related-party links that ghost-employee payroll extract actually shows.
• Test cutoff, reversals, and system-of-record ties for materiality on inventory exists or is.
• Quantify the entry if litigation-support partner has to reverse it.
• For this Forensic Accounting Revenue Integrity file, read ghost-employee payroll extract against a tax-authority information document request and write the one fact that would move inventory exists or is for litigation-support partner.

Recommendation

Choose Inventory exists / Is only on paper on this Forensic Accounting / Revenue Integrity packet (ghost-employee payroll extract after a tax-authority information document request). The follow-on Revenue Integrity action is what litigation-support partner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

Command returns