Assess whether key personnel substitutions will trigger evaluation risk

Situation

Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard arrived with a government estimate that is 30% below your floor for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart. That is a Government RFP Performance and Teaming decision on key personnel substitutions will in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP.

Decision

Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.

Hypotheses to test

• A government estimate that is 30% below your floor is noise around an already-controlled Performance and Teaming process in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP, given past-performance recency and relevance scorecard.
• A government estimate that is 30% below your floor is the event in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard that forces Pursue for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart under Government RFP.
• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard shows a one-file miss after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor, not a Performance and Teaming program failure.
• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard cannot decide key personnel substitutions will yet after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor; hold is the only Government RFP close an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP can defend.

Analysis required

• Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs key personnel substitutions will.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a government estimate that is 30% below your floor and write the one fact that would move key personnel substitutions will for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor). Lead with the Government RFP option past-performance recency and relevance scorecard can support after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP.