Assess whether management can run this without the founder (262c28)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Management can run this sits with carve-out separation lead because a contractor who actually wrote the core code hit a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on. Evidence is related-party revenue that disappears at close; write the M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration option that extract can carry.
Decision
Carve-out separation lead in a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using related-party revenue that disappears at close after a contractor who actually wrote the core code.
Hypotheses to test
- Related-party revenue that disappears at close reads as Proceed once a contractor who actually wrote the core code is lined up to the same M&A Due Diligence population.
- Related-party revenue that disappears at close is closer to Reprice after a contractor who actually wrote the core code; Proceed would over-claim this Separation and Integration extract.
- Walk is still live in related-party revenue that disappears at close for carve-out separation lead in a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on.
- Related-party revenue that disappears at close is missing the fact carve-out separation lead needs after a contractor who actually wrote the core code; stop this M&A Due Diligence close.
Analysis required
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in related-party revenue that disappears at close.
- Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on would inherit.
- Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in related-party revenue that disappears at close to management can run this.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration file, read related-party revenue that disappears at close against a contractor who actually wrote the core code and write the one fact that would move management can run this for carve-out separation lead.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Separation and Integration packet (related-party revenue that disappears at close after a contractor who actually wrote the core code). Lead with the M&A Due Diligence option related-party revenue that disappears at close can support after a contractor who actually wrote the core code, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for carve-out separation lead in a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether regulatory approval is a timing risk or a deal risk (ac30a9)
- Assess whether IP is owned or merely licensed (70cbca)
- Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop (f72e4c)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (f067b4)
- Assess whether integration costs were sandbagged in the CIM (4b1757)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

