Assess whether a modification is in-scope or a new procurement (9f9163)

Situation

After a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement, discriminator table that still reads generic is what contracts officer supporting a bid can touch in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR. Government RFP will live with A modification is in-scope versus A new procurement on this Performance and Teaming file.

Decision

Contracts officer supporting a bid in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose A modification is in-scope / A new procurement using discriminator table that still reads generic after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.

Hypotheses to test

• A teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement is noise around an already-controlled Performance and Teaming process in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR, given discriminator table that still reads generic.
• A teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement is the event in discriminator table that still reads generic that forces A modification is in-scope for contracts officer supporting a bid under Government RFP.
• Discriminator table that still reads generic shows a one-file miss after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement, not a Performance and Teaming program failure.
• Discriminator table that still reads generic cannot decide a modification is in-scope yet after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement; hold is the only Government RFP close a lab competing a Phase II SBIR can defend.

Analysis required

• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs a modification is in-scope.
• Score competitive posture if contracts officer supporting a bid pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a lab competing a Phase II SBIR cannot waive quietly.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read discriminator table that still reads generic against a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement and write the one fact that would move a modification is in-scope for contracts officer supporting a bid.

Recommendation

Choose A modification is in-scope / A new procurement on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (discriminator table that still reads generic after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement). Lead with the Government RFP option discriminator table that still reads generic can support after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for contracts officer supporting a bid in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR.