Assess whether monitoring detects drift or only outages (723efd)

SITUATION Decision-audit designer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights has one working extract — decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step — after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. If decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step cannot support monitoring detects drift or, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Monitoring detects drift / Only outages using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is noise around an already-controlled Control Plane and Scoring process in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights, given decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step. 2. Two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is the event in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step that forces Monitoring detects drift for decision-audit designer under AI Governance Layer. 3. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step shows a one-file miss after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file, not a Control Plane and Scoring program failure. 4. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step cannot decide monitoring detects drift or yet after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights. 2. Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate decision-audit designer can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let monitoring detects drift or proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move monitoring detects drift or for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Monitoring detects drift / Only outages on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). If decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Control Plane and Scoring, stop. If decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file cannot support Monitoring detects drift versus Only outages on this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring close, decision-audit designer must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.