Assess whether the MRO interview was complete enough to verify (96c077)

SITUATION Specimen Validity work in a DOT-covered motor carrier after a fatal crash now turns on the MRO interview was because an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff put split-specimen B bottle request timeline in play. Medical review officer should say what split-specimen B bottle request timeline proves.

DECISION Medical review officer in a DOT-covered motor carrier after a fatal crash must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using split-specimen B bottle request timeline after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Split-specimen B bottle request timeline reads as Accept the result once an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is lined up to the same Forensic Drug Testing population. 2. Split-specimen B bottle request timeline is closer to Reject on custody after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff; Accept the result would over-claim this Specimen Validity extract. 3. Recollect is still live in split-specimen B bottle request timeline for medical review officer in a DOT-covered motor carrier after a fatal crash. 4. Split-specimen B bottle request timeline is missing the fact medical review officer needs after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff; stop this Forensic Drug Testing close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol a DOT-covered motor carrier after a fatal crash claims to run. 2. Walk chain of custody, collection site, and validity flags in split-specimen B bottle request timeline after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff. 3. Name the step medical review officer cannot reconstruct from split-specimen B bottle request timeline. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity file, read split-specimen B bottle request timeline against an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff and write the one fact that would move the MRO interview was for medical review officer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Specimen Validity packet (split-specimen B bottle request timeline after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff). Lead with the Forensic Drug Testing option split-specimen B bottle request timeline can support after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for medical review officer in a DOT-covered motor carrier after a fatal crash.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Forensic Drug Testing option on the MRO interview was, then the evidence in split-specimen B bottle request timeline, then the action for medical review officer - Hypothesis scorecard against split-specimen B bottle request timeline: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Accept the result, Reject on custody, Recollect and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for medical review officer in a DOT-covered motor carrier after a fatal crash