Assess whether observed collection is justified and documented (d43b5a)

SITUATION The working file is hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff. Medical review officer in a company transitioning to oral fluid has to name Accept the result or Reject on custody for this Forensic Drug Testing Program Design and Audit file.

DECISION Medical review officer in a company transitioning to oral fluid must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision reads as Accept the result once an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is lined up to the same Forensic Drug Testing population. 2. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision is closer to Reject on custody after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff; Accept the result would over-claim this Program Design and Audit extract. 3. Recollect is still live in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision for medical review officer in a company transitioning to oral fluid. 4. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision is missing the fact medical review officer needs after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff; stop this Forensic Drug Testing close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a broken seal, timing miss, or donor explanation changes observed collection is justified. 2. Confirm the kit ID in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision matches the collection log. 3. Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol a company transitioning to oral fluid claims to run. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Program Design and Audit file, read hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision against an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff and write the one fact that would move observed collection is justified for medical review officer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Program Design and Audit packet (hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff). If hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision cannot force a Forensic Drug Testing label under Program Design and Audit, stop. If hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff cannot support Accept the result versus Reject on custody on this Forensic Drug Testing Program Design and Audit close, medical review officer must do not accept, reject, or recollect beyond what custody and validity support.